[ciapug] Eclipse IDE
Dave J. Hala Jr.
dave at 58ghz.net
Mon Aug 22 09:52:49 CDT 2005
I was probably using the 2.x version..
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 09:50, Jerry Weida wrote:
> Which version did you try? 3.1 is out now and is significantly faster
> than the old 2.x branch. I run it on my Pentium M 1.6 GHz with 512MB
> of RAM and have no complaints.
>
> On 8/22/05, Dave J. Hala Jr. <dave at 58ghz.net> wrote:
> I experimented a while back with the Eclipse IDE. My
> experience was that
> it was painfully slow. While I wasn't using high-end hardware
> (2ghz
> celeron, 1gb ram on xp) I didn't think that my hardware choice
> that
> bad...
>
> Anyone else have the same experience?
>
> :) Dave
> --
>
> Open Source Information Systems (OSIS)
> Dave J. Hala Jr. <dave at osis.us>
> 641.485.1606
>
> _______________________________________________
> ciapug mailing list
> ciapug at cialug.org
> http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/ciapug
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> ciapug mailing list
> ciapug at cialug.org
> http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/ciapug
--
Open Source Information Systems (OSIS)
Dave J. Hala Jr. <dave at osis.us>
641.485.1606
More information about the ciapug
mailing list