[ciapug] Eclipse IDE

Dave J. Hala Jr. dave at 58ghz.net
Mon Aug 22 09:52:49 CDT 2005


I was probably using the 2.x version..


On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 09:50, Jerry Weida wrote:
> Which version did you try?  3.1 is out now and is significantly faster
> than the old 2.x branch.  I run it on my Pentium M 1.6 GHz with 512MB
> of RAM and have no complaints.
> 
> On 8/22/05, Dave J. Hala Jr. <dave at 58ghz.net> wrote: 
>         I experimented a while back with the Eclipse IDE. My
>         experience was that
>         it was painfully slow. While I wasn't using high-end hardware
>         (2ghz 
>         celeron, 1gb ram on xp) I didn't think that my hardware choice
>         that
>         bad...
>         
>         Anyone else have the same experience?
>         
>         :) Dave
>         --
>         
>         Open Source Information Systems (OSIS)
>         Dave J. Hala Jr. <dave at osis.us>
>         641.485.1606
>         
>         _______________________________________________
>         ciapug mailing list
>         ciapug at cialug.org
>         http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/ciapug
> 
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> ciapug mailing list
> ciapug at cialug.org
> http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/ciapug
-- 

Open Source Information Systems (OSIS)
Dave J. Hala Jr. <dave at osis.us>
641.485.1606



More information about the ciapug mailing list