[Cialug] Mediacom - not Linux related

Mon Sep 18 14:04:36 UTC 2017

If you ignore those warnings from Mediacom on copyright infringement. 1st
offense is generally a warning. 2nd offense your services are suspended.
And on the 3rd offense your services are canceled. And it is nearly
impossible to get service back again at the same address and name. You may
not be able to get back under the your name anywhere in Mediacom's
territory.

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 8:59 AM, David Champion <dchamp1337 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> I know several people that have been booted from Mediacom for multiple
> alleged infringements. From what I understand it's difficult to get service
> back from them.
>
> I think what Kevin did, while painful, was probably best to get it all
> resolved.
>
> -dc
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Dave Hala <dave at 58ghz.net> wrote:
>
> > I wonder what would happen if you just ignored Mediacom.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Kevin Smith <kevin at linuxsmith.com>
> wrote:
> > > It is annoying they expected my mother to solve it. It turned out even
> > > better when we figured out the Mediacom installation had not been done
> > > correctly; meaning they caused the problem and my mother's Internet
> > service
> > > wasn't the source of the "infringement". They caused her a lot of
> anxiety
> > > and got all preachy about her being responsible for activity on her
> home
> > > network. They also claimed be 100% sure (because of the IP) that it
> came
> > > from her network; turns out they can't be as sure as they say. Another
> > > annoyance, it took multiple calls before I got someone that I could
> > > communicate with and who had the technical knowledge to help solve the
> > > issue; all others seemed to say not our problem it's yours and left it
> > > there.
> > >
> > > Never been a Mediacom fan and this experience didn't improve my
> opinion.
> > >
> > > On Sep 17, 2017 20:29, "Todd Walton" <tdwalton at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I got one of those letters once, for something that clearly wasn't me.
> > Call
> > > me crazy, but I'd send back a short letter with a number of four letter
> > > words informing them of where they can go. They can claim "common
> > carrier"
> > > status but you're supposed to be responsible for that stuff?
> > >
> > > Who are they to commission you as sheriff of your internet connection?
> > Why
> > > is it your mandatory responsibility to clutch at your internet
> connection
> > > like a Gollum with his precious so you can carry out someone else's
> dirty
> > > work for them?
> > >
> > > I'm feeling irritated with stupidity today. More than usual, I mean.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Todd
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Kevin Smith <kevin at linuxsmith.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Figured it out I think. They used a contractor to do the install, who
> > >> failed to add a MoCA filter. Apparently, without that what we are
> > >> experiencing can happen. Two cable Internet services are combined
> > somehow.
> > >> I'm actually seeing devices on someone else's cable Internet service
> on
> > > her
> > >> network; and Mediacom is seeing their online activity as my mother's.
> > >>
> > >> Anyway, they are sending someone out to correct it. They removed the
> > >> "violations" from her account.
> > >>
> > >> On Sep 5, 2017 13:00, "tony welder" <tony.wvoip at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > For starters, it may not be the modem/wifi, it could be her
> computer.
> > > If
> > >> > the computer is compromised, they may be using it to seed the
> content
> > >> out.
> > >> > It wouldn't matter what service you were on, the problem would
> follow
> > > you
> > >> > no matter where you go.
> > >> >
> > >> > There's also the possibility that she is actually pirating the
> content
> > >> > herself.  It's the most pirated show on the planet right now... just
> > >> > saying.
> > >> >
> > >> > WPA2 is tough to break.  I've tried several times, it just takes way
> > too
> > >> > long, requires some decent hardware (GPU for running through a
> > >> dictionary,
> > >> > then john the ripper plus regex on dictionary... then finally a
> brute
> > >> > force(which damn near NEVER works) ) and requires a lot of luck.
> > >> >
> > >> > If we're still hung up on it being your WIFI then they maybe getting
> > in
> > >> > through WPS.  A lot of devices say they have it disabled... when all
> > > they
> > >> > did was disable it through through the web interface.  Takes me
> about
> > 5
> > >> > minutes to break into those.  If you actually set it up, then it
> will
> > >> take
> > >> > me up to 2 days assuming the devices doesn't have any serious
> counter
> > >> > measures.  With a device the employs more than just simple
> throttling,
> > > it
> > >> > could take me over a month to break in.
> > >> >
> > >> > I recommend doing some sort of packet capture, at the top of that
> > >> network,
> > >> > to see if any devices are compromised.  It's one of the best ways to
> > >> figure
> > >> > out if one of your IOT devices or person X's computer is
> compromised.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Cheers,
> > >> > Tony
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Justin Richeson <
> > neomatrixjr at gmail.com>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > My IP seems to stick as long as my down time is minimal.  My guess
> > is
> > >> > > unless you're offline while they do a lease reset, you get the
> same
> > IP
> > >> > > back.  Or unless they change routing behind the scenes.  I know
> I've
> > >> had
> > >> > my
> > >> > > IP changed a few times, but defiantly had it more than two
> > >> > weeks...probably
> > >> > > had my current IP at least since we had a major outage early this
> > > year.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 10:42 AM, L. V. Lammert <lvl at omnitec.net>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > On Tue, 5 Sep 2017, Dave Hala wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > My experience with mediacom was that the dhcp lease on an ip
> > >> > addresswas
> > >> > > > roughly two weeks.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > How interesting!  I have been using the same IP [as static] for
> > over
> > >> > five
> > >> > > > years on the firwall box behind our Charter modem, .. as long as
> > we
> > >> > keep
> > >> > > > it active, their system will not reprovision for another user.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Anyone tried a similar strategy with MediaComm?
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >         Lee
> > >> > > > _______________________________________________
> > >> > > > Cialug mailing list
> > >> > > > Cialug at cialug.org
> > >> > > > http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > _______________________________________________
> > >> > > Cialug mailing list
> > >> > > Cialug at cialug.org
> > >> > > http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > ~tony
> > >> > _______________________________________________
> > >> > Cialug mailing list
> > >> > Cialug at cialug.org
> > >> > http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
> > >> >
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Cialug mailing list
> > >> Cialug at cialug.org
> > >> http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
> > >>
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Cialug mailing list
> > > Cialug at cialug.org
> > > http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Cialug mailing list
> > > Cialug at cialug.org
> > > http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > NIFCAP  -The Premier Client Intake System for Non-Profit Organizations.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Cialug mailing list
> > Cialug at cialug.org
> > http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Cialug mailing list
> Cialug at cialug.org
> http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
>