[Cialug] OT: ipcop

[Lee]

If you asked Eve, then of course there was something wrong with Adam. I
think about every married guy has had that little discussion!

-----Original Message-----
From: cialug-admin@cialug.org [mailto:cialug-admin@cialug.org]On Behalf
Of Allen Kiddoo
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 10:37 AM
To: cialug@cialug.org
Subject: Re: [Cialug] ipcop


AND-

Since Eve was a spinoff of Adam, there
must be something wrong with Adam?

Allen


---------- Original Message -----------
From: Claus <cniesen@gmx.net>
To: cialug@cialug.org
Sent: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 08:54:01 -0600
Subject: Re: [Cialug] ipcop

> > IPCop is similar because it is a direct fork of smoothwall, which would
> > imply that there was/is something wrong with the smoothwall project.  I
> > would like to stress the importance of looking into the history of
> > Smoothwall before supporting them.
>
> Wow, harsh statement.  "OpenBSD is similar because it is a direct
> fork of NetBSD, which would imply that there was/is something wrong
> with the NetBSD project."  While some OpenBSD people do agree with
> that I don't think that statement is appropriate.  I read the same
> out of the IPCop/Smoothwall statement.  This game can be played with
> many other forks.  No reason was given why Smoothwall has/had
> something wrong with it.  In fact it sounds like the poster doesn't
> know much about Smoothwall, just like me - I don't know either
> software.  With that the statement above not only has no value but
> it's also misleading.
>
>    Claus
> _______________________________________________
> Cialug mailing list
> Cialug@cialug.org
> http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
------- End of Original Message -------

_______________________________________________
Cialug mailing list
Cialug@cialug.org
http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug