[Cialug] best supported/performing Ethernet adapter?

Theron Conrey theron at conrey.org
Sun Jun 12 00:50:55 CDT 2005


That always seems to be the driver in any of the servers I've built.  
Works well.  This is a realtek card, was wary at first but debian picked 
it right up no issues.  I'll second that bit about the linksys cards 
however.......
Theron

Jonathan Bailey wrote:

>I've done pretty well with the Intel (e100 driver) cards/onboard. 
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: cialug-bounces at cialug.org [mailto:cialug-bounces at cialug.org] On Behalf
>Of Dan Hockey
>Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2005 10:36 PM
>To: Central Iowa Linux Users Group
>Subject: Re: [Cialug] best supported/performing Ethernet adapter?
>
>Nathan C. Smith wrote:
>
>  
>
>>I think it is a true statement that not all Ethernet cards and their 
>>drivers are equal.  My sense is that the inexpensive realtek and VINE 
>>chips/cards depend more on well-written drivers than intelligence built 
>>into the chips/cards.  Can anyone recommend a well-performing 100 
>>megabit card with good Linux support?  Are 3Com and Intel cards good
>>    
>>
>choices?
>  
>
>>-Nate
>>_______________________________________________
>>Cialug mailing list
>>Cialug at cialug.org
>>http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
>>
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>3com is the only nic I've used and haven't had any problems in linux. 
>Linksys will work but it took a little work to find the right driver. so far
>those are the brands I've used.
>-dh
>
>_______________________________________________
>Cialug mailing list
>Cialug at cialug.org
>http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
>
>_______________________________________________
>Cialug mailing list
>Cialug at cialug.org
>http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
>
>  
>



More information about the Cialug mailing list