[Cialug] raid/nas

[n.d]

the coffers aren't that deep. i'm looking to build myne own.


if i won the lottery by all means i would be getting a whole closet full 
of them. but that won't happen when you don't play. ;)


John.Lengeling at radisys.com wrote:

>
> For the size that you are looking at, I think you should be looking at 
> SAN or NAS solutions instead of direct attached storage.
>
> I really like Network Appliance (www.netapp.com) they just run and 
> run.  Average uptimes on these devices are in the order of 400-500 
> days.  Well worth all the money for a NetApp.
> They support multiprotocols (CIFS, NFS,  HTTP, iSCSI, FiberChannel)
>
> johnl
>
>
>
> *"n.d" <admin at c0wzftp.com>*
> Sent by: cialug-bounces at cialug.org
>
> 08/30/2005 09:48 PM
> Please respond to
> Central Iowa Linux Users Group <cialug at cialug.org>
>
>
> 	
> To
> 	cialug at cialug.org
> cc
> 	
> Subject
> 	[Cialug] raid/nas
>
>
>
> 	
>
>
>
>
>
> anyone know some good raid controllers that work excellent in linux? i'm
> thinking serial ata before ide or eide. no scsi plz
>
> i've never used raid before.  i'm looking to make a fileserver with
> ~100-150tb of storage. also like to have some expandibility in the future.
>
> NAS anyone?
> -- 
> Get Thunderbird <http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cialug mailing list
> Cialug at cialug.org
> http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Cialug mailing list
>Cialug at cialug.org
>http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
>  
>


-- 
Get Thunderbird <http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/>