[Cialug] Apache or not?

[Dave Weis]

On Thu, 28 Apr 2005, Nathan C. Smith wrote:
> There was one that was supposed to be "in memory", was that an Apache
> Product?  The upshot was pages were cached in memory and delivered faster
> without a trip to disk.

If you are doing static content and have enough ram, everything will be 
cached after a few hits.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Weis [mailto:djweis@internetsolver.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 8:47 AM
> To: cialug@cialug.org
> Subject: Re: [Cialug] Apache or not?
>
>
>
> Lee wrote:
>> Does anyone not host with Apache? If not, what do you use and why?
>
> It varies, some with resin (www.caucho.com) and some with aolserver
> (www.aolserver.com). They are both orders of magnitude ahead of tomcat
> and apache, respectively, but they aren't terribly popular yet.
>
> dave
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cialug mailing list
> Cialug@cialug.org
> http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
> _______________________________________________
> Cialug mailing list
> Cialug@cialug.org
> http://cialug.org/mailman/listinfo/cialug
>

-- 
Dave Weis             "I believe there are more instances of the abridgment
djweis@sjdjweis.com   of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent
                       encroachments of those in power than by violent
                       and sudden usurpations."- James Madison